What Is Sanctions Evasion and How It Works

Sanctions evasion refers to attempts by individuals, companies, or states to bypass economic or trade restrictions imposed by governments or international bodies. In 2025, sanctions evasion has become increasingly sophisticated, involving complex ownership structures, shell companies, deceptive shipping practices, and digital assets. This article explains what sanctions evasion is, how it works, why people engage in it, notable cases, and the regulatory and financial risks organizations face when they encounter evasion networks.

What Is Sanctions Evasion?

Sanctions evasion occurs when a person or entity takes deliberate steps to avoid the effects of sanctions. These restrictions may include trade prohibitions, asset freezes, financial restrictions, travel bans, or sector-specific measures imposed by authorities such as OFAC, the European Union, the United Nations, or the UK Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation.

Evasion involves actions that conceal the identity of a sanctioned party or the nature of a prohibited transaction. While sanctions aim to restrict access to global financial systems, advanced technology, or military goods, evasion networks attempt to maintain access by exploiting loopholes, weak oversight, or intermediary jurisdictions.

Sanctions evasion is illegal under most jurisdictions. Companies that fail to detect it risk enforcement actions, financial penalties, reputational damage, and loss of banking relationships.

{{snippets-guide}}

How Sanctions Evasion Works: Common Methods

Sanctions evasion relies on tactics designed to obscure the identity of a sanctioned party or disguise the origin and destination of goods, funds, or services. These tactics evolve constantly in response to regulatory changes.

Using Shell Companies and Complex Ownership Structures

One of the most common forms of sanctions evasion involves the use of shell companies or layered ownership structures. These entities may have no real employees, office space, or operations. Instead, they serve as intermediaries that hide the connection between a sanctioned individual and a transaction.

For example, the OFAC 50 Percent Rule considers any company owned 50 percent or more by a sanctioned person to be sanctioned itself. To bypass this, evaders create structures where multiple shells each own smaller percentages, making beneficial ownership difficult to trace. Some evasion networks use nominee directors, offshore entities, and corporate service providers based in jurisdictions with limited transparency.

Companies interacting with customers in jurisdictions known for opaque registries must conduct enhanced due diligence to identify indirect links to sanctioned individuals.

Using Third-Party Intermediaries and Transshipment Hubs

Evasion networks often route goods or payments through countries not subject to sanctions to mask the final destination. This strategy is known as transshipment.

Examples include:

• routing restricted goods through countries adjacent to sanctioned states
  
  
• using trading companies that re-label cargo
  
  
• shipping goods through free-trade zones
  
  
• conducting payments through banks in intermediary countries
  
  

Eurostat and UN Comtrade data show that several countries have experienced increased imports of European high-priority goods that later appear in sanctioned jurisdictions. This pattern has drawn attention from the EU and OFAC, which now emphasize end-use verification and supply chain due diligence.

Maritime Sanctions Evasion Tactics

Shipping plays a major role in sanctions evasion, particularly for oil, military components, and sensitive technologies. Maritime tactics include:

• disabling Automatic Identification System (AIS) transponders
  
  
• ship-to-ship transfers at sea
  
  
• repainting vessel names or altering IMO numbers
  
  
• using deceptive shipping documentation
  
  
• changing flag registrations to obscure ownership
  
  

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) and European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) have documented cases where sanctioned states, particularly Russia, Iran, and North Korea, use “shadow fleets” to transport oil and other goods.

Use of Cryptoassets and Digital Financial Channels

Cryptocurrency has become a tool in sanctions evasion because it allows cross-border transfers without reliance on traditional banking systems. In recent years:

• North Korean cyber groups have stolen or laundered more than one billion dollars through crypto channels, according to the UN Panel of Experts
  
  
• ransomware operators linked to sanctioned individuals have used crypto mixers to obfuscate financial trails
  
  
• sanctioned states have launched digital asset mining operations to generate revenue without involving banks
  
  

Regulators expect companies to monitor blockchain activity for wallet addresses linked to sanctioned entities, high-risk jurisdictions, or mixing services.

{{snippets-case}}

False Documentation, Mislabeling, and Fraudulent Invoices

Evasion frequently involves falsifying:

• invoices
  
  
• shipping manifests
  
  
• certificates of origin
  
  
• product descriptions
  
  
• insurance documents
  
  

This type of fraud helps move restricted items such as electronics, sensors, or dual-use components that appear harmless on paper. Traders may classify goods under alternative HS codes or intentionally misdescribe their use to avoid detection.

Sources: FATF Guidance on Trade-Based Money Laundering (2023), UN Panel of Experts Reports.

Why People Evade Sanctions

Sanctions create economic pressure, limit access to financial systems, and restrict trade. The motives for evasion vary but generally fall into several categories.

Preserving Access to Revenue

Individuals, companies, or governments may attempt to maintain income streams cut off by sanctions. This can include:

• oil exports
  
  
• mineral sales
  
  
• arms and dual-use technologies
  
  
• financial transactions
  
  
• cryptocurrency mining
  
  

For example, UN reports show that Iran and North Korea rely heavily on illicit oil shipments to generate revenue despite export bans.

Obtaining Restricted Technology or Weapons

Certain sanctioned states want to acquire Western electronics, precision manufacturing tools, aviation parts, or military components. These items are critical for weapons development and industrial capacity.

Investigations by the EU and United States have found Western-origin semiconductors, GPS modules, and other components in missile fragments recovered on the battlefield.

Avoiding Asset Freezes

Sanctioned individuals may move assets into offshore structures, nominee accounts, trusts, or cryptocurrency to avoid asset freezes. High-profile enforcement cases reveal efforts to transfer ownership to family members, shell companies, or professional intermediaries.

Maintaining International Banking Access

Sanctions restrict access to SWIFT, correspondent banking relationships, or dollar clearing. Evasion networks attempt to bypass these restrictions by creating financial intermediaries, using alternative currencies, or engaging in barter or commodity-based trade.

Funding Designated Organizations

Some sanctioned groups use evasion tactics to support organizations designated for terrorism, cybercrime, or international instability. Governments worldwide treat this type of evasion as a serious national security threat.

Famous Cases of Sanctions Evasion

Iran’s Oil Shipping Evasion Networks

Iran has repeatedly used ship-to-ship transfers, disguising the origin of oil by blending cargoes or falsifying export documents. The US Treasury has issued multiple advisories outlining Iran’s use of deceptive shipping practices, including vessels changing names, flags, and ownership layers.

North Korea’s Cyber and Maritime Evasion

North Korea engages in sophisticated sanctions evasion across cyber and maritime channels. The UN Panel of Experts documents:

• crypto hacks targeting exchanges
• ransomware operations linked to Lazarus Group
• clandestine coal shipments using falsified vessel documentation
  
  

These tactics help fund North Korea’s missile and nuclear programs.

Russian Evasion Through Third Countries

Following the invasion of Ukraine, Russia began using complex trade routes through neighboring states to access EU-controlled goods. Reports from the European Commission and OECD note large increases in exports of restricted goods from the EU to Central Asian countries, often exceeding those countries’ domestic needs.

Venezuela’s Gold Smuggling Networks

Investigations by the US Treasury and international organizations revealed that Venezuela used gold shipments routed through neighboring countries to evade sanctions on its oil sector. These gold flows were often connected to corruption and illicit finance networks.

Syria’s Humanitarian and Construction Front Companies

The Syrian government has relied on sanctioned front companies to move funds, obtain industrial goods, and benefit from reconstruction projects. These entities often hide connections through complex ownership structures or false documentation.

Risks Associated With Sanctions Evasion for Businesses

Sanctions evasion poses severe risks even for companies that do not intend to violate sanctions. Regulatory bodies hold businesses accountable for failing to detect evasion or for inadequate due diligence.

Legal and Regulatory Penalties

Companies that unwittingly facilitate sanctions evasion may face:

• penalties from OFAC
  
  
• EU or UK enforcement actions
  
  
• seizure of goods or assets
  
  
• loss of licenses or banking relationships
  
  

Regulators often impose penalties even when the violation is unintentional.

Reputational Damage

Being associated with sanctions evasion can severely damage a company’s reputation with:

• customers
  
  
• investors
  
  
• partners
  
  
• regulators
  
  

Financial institutions may face public scrutiny, while vendors may lose access to global markets.

Increased Banking Restrictions and De-risking

Banks may restrict or terminate relationships with companies that present sanctions risks. This is particularly common in high-risk sectors such as logistics, commodities, maritime trade, and cryptoassets.

Operational Disruption

Transactions may be delayed or blocked if screening systems detect suspicious behavior. Supply chains can be disrupted if goods are seized or shipments investigated.

Criminal Exposure

Knowingly facilitating sanctions evasion can result in criminal charges. In some jurisdictions, executives may face personal liability.

Conclusion

Sanctions evasion is a significant challenge in global finance and international trade. It involves deliberate strategies to bypass restrictions through shell companies, deceptive shipping practices, intermediaries, fraudulent documentation, and digital assets. High-profile cases show how complex and organized these networks can be. 

Businesses must implement strong sanctions screening, beneficial ownership verification, and continuous monitoring to detect evasion risks. As sanctions expand and enforcement intensifies, understanding how sanctions evasion works is critical to maintaining compliance and avoiding severe penalties.

sanctions.io is a highly reliable and cost-effective solution for real-time screening. AI-powered and with an enterprise-grade API with 99.99% uptime are reasons why customers globally trust us with their compliance efforts and sanctions screening needs.

To learn more about how our sanctions, PEP, and criminal watchlist screening service can support your organisation's compliance program: Book a free Discovery Call.

We also encourage you to take advantage of our free 7-day trial to get started with your sanctions and AML screening (no credit card is required).