The Evolution of Russia Sanctions From Around the World

Russia sanctions have evolved from relatively targeted measures after Crimea in 2014 into one of the most expansive, coordinated sanctions regimes in modern history after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022. Since then, the EU, United States, United Kingdom, and partners have repeatedly expanded Russia sanctions to cover banking, sovereign assets, exports and imports, energy revenues, shipping networks, and third-party facilitators, while continually amending rules to close circumvention loopholes and strengthen enforcement.

{{snippets-guide}}

What People Mean When They Say “Russia Sanctions”

Russia sanctions are government-imposed restrictions designed to limit Russia’s access to money, goods, technology, and services, and to increase the economic and operational cost of state policy choices. The phrase “Russia sanctions” usually includes both broad sectoral restrictions and targeted asset freezes on individuals and entities.

In practice, Russia sanctions typically combine multiple legal tools. These tools include blocking sanctions and asset freezes, export controls, import bans, financial restrictions, travel bans, and measures that target third parties who help Russia evade restrictions. The result is not one single rulebook but an evolving ecosystem of overlapping regimes led by the EU, US, UK, and allied jurisdictions.

Russia Sanctions Before the Full-Scale War in Ukraine

Before February 2022, Russia sanctions were already significant, but they were more limited in scope and designed to deter further escalation rather than to comprehensively isolate the Russian economy. The baseline regime for many jurisdictions began after Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014, followed by years of incremental amendments and renewals.

The 2014 Shift After Crimea

The EU’s post-2014 Russia sanctions architecture is anchored in two core legal instruments that still matter today. Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 supports asset freezes and restrictions on certain persons and entities, while Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 established sectoral measures related to trade, finance, and other areas in response to the annexation of Crimea and destabilization of Ukraine. These regulations became the foundation that later packages expanded after 2022.

In the United States, the 2014 response included executive orders that created a flexible legal framework for targeting individuals and sectors tied to actions undermining Ukraine. The US Department of State summarizes how Executive Order 13660, signed March 6, 2014, authorized sanctions related to threats to Ukraine’s sovereignty, with subsequent actions expanding scope.

These earlier measures were meaningful, but they were not built to sever broad categories of Russia’s financial connectivity. Many global businesses still operated in Russia, and compliance programs often treated Russia as a high-risk jurisdiction rather than a near-comprehensive sanctions environment.

The Pre-2022 Compliance Reality

Before the 2022 invasion, many organizations managed Russia sanctions primarily through customer and counterparty screening, sectoral restrictions, and careful trade controls in specific industries. Banks often focused on sanctioned persons and certain debt or equity restrictions, while exporters focused on controlled goods and licensing.

That changed abruptly in 2022. The policy objective shifted from targeted deterrence to sustained economic pressure, revenue reduction, and industrial constraint.

The Turning Point: February 24, 2022 and the Acceleration of Russia Sanctions

Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022 triggered an immediate and coordinated escalation of sanctions from major Western jurisdictions. The political consensus in many capitals moved quickly, and sanctions policy became a central instrument of the international response.

This period introduced a new sanctions pattern that still defines the regime today. Governments began rolling out repeated packages and amendments, each one targeting additional sectors, closing loopholes, and expanding the list of designated persons and entities.

The EU: Sanctions Packages and the Move to Continuous Expansion

The EU became one of the most active architects of Russia sanctions after February 2022. Rather than relying on one-off changes, the EU adopted a package-based approach, issuing sequential “packages of restrictive measures” that expanded and refined restrictions.

EU Sanctions Packages Since February 2022

The Council of the EU maintains an official timeline of sanctions packages adopted since February 2022. This timeline is one of the most reliable ways to understand how Russia sanctions expanded in structured waves, including measures across finance, trade, transport, energy, and anti-circumvention.

Across these packages, the EU progressively restricted export of sensitive technologies, expanded import bans, imposed asset freezes on individuals and entities, and introduced measures targeting circumvention routes and third-country intermediaries. Over time, the EU also deepened its focus on maritime evasion tactics and “shadow fleet” logistics, reflecting the reality that sanctions pressure often shifts behavior rather than stopping it entirely.

Key EU “Big Ticket” Measures During the War

Some of the most consequential EU actions included financial sector restrictions, technology export controls, and energy-related measures. A key early example was the decision to exclude certain Russian banks from SWIFT, coordinated with partners, which disrupted international payment messaging for designated institutions. The European Commission’s March 2, 2022 press release captures the EU decision to exclude key Russian banks from SWIFT.

Another major step involved immobilizing Russian sovereign assets within EU jurisdictions. A 2025 European Parliamentary Research Service brief explains that within days of the February 2022 invasion, the EU included measures that immobilized large volumes of Russian Central Bank assets under EU jurisdiction, often cited around €210 billion held in the EU.

Later EU Packages and the Energy Revenue Strategy

As the war continued, EU measures increasingly targeted Russia’s ability to generate revenue from energy and to obtain critical components for its military-industrial base. Over time, the EU also emphasized anti-circumvention obligations, recognizing that trade diversion and re-export networks can undermine restrictions.

Reporting and analysis around later EU packages highlights how EU measures evolved to include tighter controls on sectors and more explicit attention to circumvention. For example, public legal summaries of the EU’s 14th package adopted June 24, 2024 emphasize energy, finance, anti-circumvention, and trade restrictions as continuing priorities.

In 2025, EU sanctions strategy was closely tied to energy revenue constraints and shipping enforcement, including coordination on the oil price cap and increasing pressure on “shadow fleet” vessels and related service providers. Reuters reported that the EU agreed to an 18th sanctions package in July 2025, including a reduction of the price cap and additional restrictions tied to pipelines and the financial sector, with statements from senior EU leadership.

The United States: OFAC, Executive Orders, and Secondary-Style Pressure

The United States has been central to Russia sanctions through the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and a series of executive orders and determinations that enable both blocking sanctions and sectoral restrictions. US policy has also increasingly used tools designed to deter non-US actors from supporting Russia’s sanctioned economy.

The OFAC Framework and the Post-2022 Expansion

US Russia sanctions draw on several authorities, including frameworks originating in 2014 and expanded significantly after 2022. OFAC maintains public FAQs and program documentation that describe how key executive orders authorize blocking and other measures.

A major feature of the US approach has been continuous updates that target banks, defense and technology procurement networks, and facilitators outside Russia. These actions are designed to increase the cost of helping Russia access restricted goods and financial channels.

Targeting the Financial System and Global Facilitators

The US has repeatedly targeted the Russian financial sector and pursued actions aimed at reducing Russia’s ability to transact through international channels. A notable step was the issuance of a new Russia-related executive order on December 22, 2023, described by OFAC as “taking additional steps” related to Russia’s harmful activities, alongside determinations and compliance guidance.

This phase is important because it reflects a shift toward pressuring non-US financial institutions and intermediaries that maintain Russia-linked flows. Even when the term “secondary sanctions” is not used in a technical sense, the compliance impact can feel similar because global banks may de-risk to avoid exposure.

The United Kingdom: OFSI Enforcement and Asset Freezes at Scale

The UK’s Russia sanctions regime has been a major pillar of the global sanctions architecture, driven by wide-ranging designations and increasingly active enforcement. The Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation plays a central role in implementation, licensing, guidance, and compliance expectations.

UK Implementation and Measurable Freezing Outcomes

The UK government reports substantial asset freezes linked to Russia sanctions. OFSI’s Annual Review 2024 to 2025 reports that, as of May 2025, £28.7 billion worth of assets linked to Russia had been frozen since February 2022.

This kind of reporting matters because it shows how sanctions regimes translate into operational outcomes. It also signals to regulated firms that enforcement and reporting expectations are not theoretical; they are active and measured.

UK Parliamentary and Regulatory Context

The UK Parliament has published research briefings summarizing the scope of UK Russia sanctions over time and pointing to official notices and designated persons lists. These resources reinforce how the UK’s regime has developed across the war period and how it interacts with broader international measures.

The “Price Cap Coalition” and the Energy Revenue Battlefield

One of the most notable innovations in Russia sanctions during the war has been the attempt to constrain energy revenue while avoiding destabilizing global supply. This led to the G7 and partners developing an oil price cap mechanism that relies on maritime services, insurance, and compliance attestations.

The 2022 Price Cap Launch

The European Commission summarized that the G7, EU, and partners agreed the oil price cap would take effect in December 2022 for crude and February 2023 for refined products, with coordinated implementation across coalition jurisdictions.

The UK government also publicly described the coalition and the $60 cap announcement in December 2022.

The 2025 Shift to a Lower Cap and Stronger Measures

By 2025, the coalition’s strategy increasingly focused on tightening the cap and targeting circumvention. Reuters reported that the EU’s 18th package included a reduction of the G7 crude oil price cap to $47.6 per barrel as part of a broader effort to weaken Russia’s energy revenues.

This shift reflects a broader trend in Russia sanctions. When initial measures create workarounds, later packages tend to focus on enforcement, maritime networks, and service denial rather than only adding more names to lists.

The Rise of Third-Party and “Shadow Fleet” Enforcement

As Russia sanctions expanded, so did efforts to counter evasion. Over time, enforcement focus increasingly moved toward third parties, shipping networks, intermediaries, and complex ownership structures used to keep trade and revenue flowing.

This is where “shadow fleet” discussions became central. Journalistic investigations and official actions have highlighted how older vessels, opaque ownership, and alternative insurance arrangements can be used to move Russian oil outside typical Western oversight. Associated Press reporting has described how a shadow fleet of hundreds of tankers has supported continued oil movement despite sanctions pressure, alongside safety and environmental risks.

For compliance teams, this matters because risk is no longer limited to obvious Russian counterparties. Exposure can occur through vessel ownership layers, third-country trading entities, re-export routes, or financial institutions that process transactions linked to sanctioned supply chains.

Who the Key Players Are in Adding, Removing, and Amending Russia Sanctions

Russia sanctions are shaped by a set of recurring institutional players. These players propose measures, adopt legal instruments, issue guidance, and enforce compliance.

The European Union’s Institutional Drivers

In the EU, the Council adopts sanctions packages and renewals, and the European Commission provides implementation and guidance signals, including sector-specific explanations. EU foreign policy leadership and member-state negotiations influence the scope and timing of packages, especially when unanimity is required.

In 2025 reporting around the EU’s 18th package, senior EU leaders were cited explaining that sanctions were designed to raise costs for Moscow and target core revenue and war-supporting capacity.

The US Treasury, State Department, and OFAC

In the United States, OFAC is the operational engine for designations, directives, general licenses, and enforcement actions. The State Department plays a key diplomatic role, coordinating with allies and communicating objectives, while executive orders and determinations provide legal authority to expand scope rapidly.

The UK Treasury and OFSI

In the UK, OFSI issues guidance, handles licensing, manages reporting frameworks, and supports enforcement. The UK’s public reporting on frozen assets demonstrates the scale of implementation and signals that compliance expectations are continuously reinforced.

The G7 and Allied Jurisdictions

The G7 plays a coordinating role for major financial and energy measures, including the oil price cap and coordinated approaches to sovereign asset immobilization and support for Ukraine. Reuters reporting on the G7-backed Ukraine loan and frozen assets underscores how Russia sanctions have become intertwined with multi-year financial strategy.

How Russia Sanctions Look Today

As of early 2026, Russia sanctions remain extensive, multi-layered, and heavily focused on enforcement and circumvention. The regime is not static. It continues to expand through EU packages, US designations, UK enforcement actions, and coordinated coalition measures.

Two themes define the current state of Russia sanctions. First, restrictions increasingly target Russia’s ability to fund the war through energy revenue and financial access. Second, sanctions policy increasingly targets the networks that enable evasion, including shipping, intermediaries, and third-country facilitators.

For companies, this creates a compliance environment where screening alone is not enough. Effective controls require ownership transparency, trade and shipping due diligence, continuous monitoring for updates, and rapid escalation procedures when red flags appear.

What This Means for Compliance Teams and Global Businesses

Russia sanctions have become a persistent feature of the global regulatory landscape, not a temporary crisis response. That means compliance teams must treat Russia exposure as an evolving, high-change domain requiring continuous updates and governance.

Organizations should expect ongoing updates to designated persons lists, sectoral restrictions, and enforcement priorities. They should also anticipate that regulators will increasingly focus on indirect exposure, third-party risk, and the quality of due diligence evidence.

The practical takeaway is straightforward. Businesses need real-time list updates, strong matching and case management, and transaction or trade monitoring that can identify Russia-linked exposure even when it is not obvious.

Conclusion

Russia sanctions have evolved from targeted measures after Crimea in 2014 into a broad and continuously expanding international sanctions regime after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The EU’s package-based approach, the US focus on OFAC authorities and global facilitators, and the UK’s implementation and enforcement through OFSI have created a highly complex compliance environment. Over time, Russia sanctions also shifted toward constraining energy revenue and targeting circumvention networks, including shipping intermediaries and third-party enablers.

sanctions.io helps teams manage Russia sanctions risk with real-time sanctions and watchlist screening built for modern compliance operations. With an enterprise-grade API, continuous updates, and audit-ready workflows, sanctions.io supports organizations that need to screen customers and counterparties, reduce false positives, and respond quickly to sanctions changes. To learn more about how our sanctions, PEP, and criminal watchlist screening service can support your organisation's compliance program: Book a free Discovery Call.

We also encourage you to take advantage of our free 7-day trial to get started with your sanctions and AML screening (no credit card is required).