Sanctions, Embargoes, and Executive Orders: What Compliance Teams Need to Know

Compliance teams operate in a world of acronyms, shifting regulations, and constant geopolitical change. Few terms cause more confusion than sanctions, international sanctions, embargoes, and executive orders. While they are often used interchangeably in the media or internal discussions, their legal and compliance implications are distinct.

For financial institutions, fintechs, and multinational corporations, these distinctions matter. Misunderstanding an embargo definition or ignoring the implications of an executive order can lead to fines, loss of licenses, and irreparable reputational damage.

This article clarifies what sanctions, embargoes, and executive orders mean, how they affect screening requirements, and why compliance teams increasingly rely on automated sanctions checks to stay compliant.

What Are Sanctions?

Sanctions are restrictions imposed by governments or international bodies (like the United Nations or the European Union) to influence behavior, punish unlawful activity, or protect national security. They typically prohibit or restrict transactions, trade, or financial dealings with specific individuals, entities, sectors, or countries.

There are several types of sanctions:

• Individual or Entity Sanctions - Target specific people or companies (e.g., oligarchs, terrorist groups, state-owned enterprises).
  
  
• Sectoral Sanctions - Restrict activities in certain industries, such as energy, defense, or finance.
  
  
• Trade Sanctions - Limit exports or imports of particular goods and technologies.
  
  
• Financial Sanctions - Freeze assets or prohibit certain financial transactions.
  
  

International sanctions often overlap, as countries coordinate through organizations like the UN Security Council. However, national regulators such as OFAC in the US, HM Treasury in the UK, or the EU Commission also maintain their own lists.

For compliance teams, sanctions mean constant screening obligations. Every customer, transaction, and counterparty must be checked against evolving lists to ensure no prohibited party slips through.

Embargo Definition and Compliance Implications

An embargo is a form of sanction, but more sweeping. By definition, an embargo is a government-imposed restriction that prohibits trade or economic activity with an entire country or region.

Examples include:

• The US embargo on Cuba, restricting most trade and financial dealings for decades.
  
  
• The UN arms embargoes, prohibiting weapons sales to certain conflict zones.

From a compliance perspective, embargoes are absolute prohibitions. While sanctions may allow for specific licenses or exceptions (such as humanitarian aid), embargoes typically block all forms of trade and engagement.

For compliance officers, the challenge lies in interpreting embargo scope. Some embargoes are “comprehensive,” while others target only specific goods. Automated screening tools that include country-based rules are critical to ensure embargo restrictions are enforced consistently across operations.

What Are Executive Orders?

In the United States, sanctions and embargoes often originate from Executive Orders (EOs) issued by the President. These are legally binding directives that authorize the Treasury Department and OFAC to implement restrictions.

A well-known example is Executive Order 13848, which addresses foreign interference in US elections. EO 13848:

• Declares a national emergency related to election security.
  
  
• Authorizes sanctions against foreign individuals or entities found to interfere in US elections.
  
  
• Directs government agencies to coordinate monitoring and enforcement.

For compliance teams, the key takeaway is that executive orders have immediate regulatory impact. Once issued, OFAC updates its sanctions lists, and firms are expected to comply without delay.

This means screening systems must be able to:

• Ingest updates in real time when executive orders expand sanctions lists.
  
  
• Re-screen existing customer bases to catch newly sanctioned parties.
  
  
• Document decisions and actions to prove compliance during audits.

How Sanctions, Embargoes, and Executive Orders Intersect

Although distinct, these tools often overlap:

• Executive orders are the legal mechanism that create or expand sanctions programs.
  
  
• Sanctions restrict specific activities with individuals, entities, or sectors.
  
  
• Embargoes apply broader restrictions, often banning trade with entire countries.

For example:

• EO 13848 authorized sanctions against election interference.
  
  
• OFAC then added specific individuals to its Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list.
  
  
• If those individuals were connected to a country already under embargo, the restrictions would compound.

From a compliance lens, this creates a layered risk environment. Screening must capture all three elements simultaneously—list-based designations, country-level embargoes, and executive order expansions.

Why Manual Processes Fall Short

Traditionally, some firms relied on manual checks—consulting government websites, cross-referencing spreadsheets, and checking customers periodically. Today, this approach is insufficient for several reasons:

1. Volume of changes - Sanctions lists are updated daily, sometimes multiple times per day.
   
   
2. Complexity - Embargoes may prohibit categories of goods or services that are difficult to track manually.
   
   
3. Speed of executive orders - New directives like EO 13848 can impose immediate obligations.
   
   
4. False positives - Common names or misspellings create alerts that overwhelm compliance teams.

Without automation, compliance teams risk missing critical updates or wasting resources chasing false positives.

{{snippets-case}}

The Case for Automated Sanctions Screening

Automated sanctions screening systems provide the scalability and accuracy needed for modern compliance programs. Key benefits include:

• Real-time list synchronization - Automatically pulls updates from OFAC, UN, EU, HM Treasury, and others.
  
  
• Country rules and embargo filters - Ensures embargo prohibitions are applied consistently to transactions and counterparties.
  
  
• Name-matching algorithms - Detects close matches and transliterations to catch sanctioned parties despite spelling variations.
  
  
• Batch re-screening - Re-checks entire customer files when new executive orders are issued.
  
  
• Audit trails - Generates reports to demonstrate compliance during regulatory examinations.
  
  

Automated systems not only reduce regulatory risk but also free up compliance officers to focus on investigation and decision-making, rather than manual data entry.

Practical Steps for Compliance Teams

1. Map Your Exposure

Start by identifying where sanctions, embargoes, and executive orders affect your operations. Are you trading internationally? Do you have customers in high-risk jurisdictions? Do you offer services that could be misused (e.g., payments, crypto, dual-use goods)?

2. Define Screening Requirements

Document policies that clarify:

• All customers undergo sanctions screening at onboarding.
  
  
• Country embargoes are checked before trade agreements or shipments.
  
  
• Systems must update within 24 hours of a new executive order.
  
  

3. Automate Where Possible

Leverage screening solutions that integrate with your CRM, payment systems, or trading platforms. The more seamless the integration, the fewer gaps exist.

4. Train Staff

Even the best system fails if staff don’t understand sanctions, embargo definitions, and executive order impacts. Frontline staff should know how to escalate alerts, while compliance officers should document investigative decisions.

5. Test and Audit

Regularly run internal audits and penetration tests to ensure your sanctions program is functioning. Regulators increasingly expect firms to self-test, not just wait for inspections.

{{snippets-guide}}

‍

Real-World Examples

• Iran Sanctions - Driven by a mix of UN resolutions, US executive orders, and EU measures, requiring layered screening across entities, sectors, and embargoes.
  
  
• Russia Sanctions (2022–2025) - Thousands of new designations across OFAC, EU, and UK lists, plus sectoral restrictions and embargoes on energy technology exports.
  
  
• EO 13848 - Shows how executive orders can expand sanctions regimes quickly, targeting individuals for election interference even outside traditional embargo programs.
  
  

These examples highlight how dynamic the sanctions landscape is, making automation essential.

The Cost of Non-Compliance

The penalties for failing to comply with sanctions, embargoes, or executive orders are severe:

• Regulatory fines - OFAC penalties can reach millions of dollars per violation.
  
  
• Criminal liability - Knowingly breaching sanctions can lead to prison sentences for executives.
  
  
• Reputational damage - Media coverage of sanctions breaches often leads to customer flight and loss of investor confidence.
  
  

With regulators showing little tolerance for “manual error” defenses, firms need to prove they are using robust, modern systems.

Key Takeaways

• Sanctions - Restrictions targeting individuals, entities, sectors, or activities.
  
  
• Embargo (definition) - A broad prohibition, usually against an entire country or region.
  
  
• Executive Orders (like EO 13848) - US legal directives that create or expand sanctions programs.
  
  
• Compliance requires real-time screening of customers, transactions, and counterparties across all three categories.
  
  
• Manual approaches are outdated; automation ensures speed, accuracy, and defensibility.
  
  

Final Thoughts

Compliance officers don’t just need to know what sanctions, embargoes, and executive orders mean in theory—they need to operationalize them in practice. With sanctions lists updating daily, embargoes restricting entire trade channels, and executive orders like 13848 introducing new categories overnight, the only sustainable approach is automated screening integrated into a firm’s AML stack.

Firms that invest in automation aren’t just protecting themselves from fines. They’re building regulatory trust, operational efficiency, and reputational resilience in an environment where one missed sanction match can undo years of credibility.

sanctions.io is a highly reliable and cost-effective solution for real-time screening. AI-powered and with an enterprise-grade API with 99.99% uptime are reasons why customers globally trust us with their compliance efforts and sanctions screening needs.

‍

To learn more about how our sanctions, PEP, and criminal watchlist screening service can support your organization's compliance program: Book a free Discovery Call.

‍

We also encourage you to take advantage of our free 7-day trial to get started with your sanctions and AML screening (no credit card is required).

‍