AML Compliance

Money Laundering: Red Flags for Compliance Officers in 2025

Identify 2025's top money laundering red flags, from AI-driven structuring to crypto and shell company misuse, and implement the enhanced controls needed for compliance.

Editorial Team
,
Basit Nayani
,
December 20, 2025

Money laundering remains one of the most significant financial crime risks in 2025, driven by increasingly advanced criminal methods that exploit AI, digital assets, cross-border payment channels, and complex corporate structures. To keep illicit funds out of the financial system, compliance officers must understand how modern laundering works, identify key red flags, and adopt strong, technology-enhanced compliance controls. This article explains the three stages of money laundering, outlines the major red flags of 2025, and offers practical steps for businesses to stay protected.

{{snippets-guide}}

What Is Money Laundering?

Money laundering is the process of concealing the illicit origin of funds generated by criminal activity so that they can be used in the legitimate economy. Criminals launder money to hide profits from fraud, corruption, cybercrime, tax evasion, sanctions evasion, and trafficking. 

According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, between two and five percent of global GDP is laundered every year, making this one of the world’s largest shadow financial systems.

The Three Stages of Money Laundering

Placement

Placement is the introduction of illicit proceeds into the financial system. Criminals often break apart deposits, use online payment platforms, convert money into cryptocurrency, or purchase high-value goods to begin distancing funds from their criminal source.

Layering

Layering involves carrying out complex, multi-step transactions to obscure the origin of the funds. These may include transfers through offshore accounts, shell companies, crypto mixers, or multiple cross-border hops that make tracing difficult.

Integration

Integration happens when funds re-enter the legitimate economy through real estate purchases, investments, business acquisitions, or loan repayments. At this point, the funds appear clean, making detection difficult without advanced monitoring.

Money Laundering Red Flags for Compliance Officers in 2025

Money laundering red flags in 2025 reflect both traditional suspicious behaviors and new patterns enabled by technology, automation, and digital finance. Compliance officers must evaluate transactional behavior, customer profiles, device intelligence, digital asset exposure, and supply chain indicators to spot the risk of illicit activity.

Sudden Increases in Account Activity or Unusual Transaction Patterns

A sharp and unexplained change in customer activity is one of the most consistent warning signs. For example, an account that historically processed small, infrequent payments may suddenly begin receiving large deposits or initiating international transfers. Rapid swings in volume may indicate placement or layering activity. Criminals increasingly use automated systems driven by AI to create transactional noise (micro-transactions, split payments, and time-distributed deposits) all designed to imitate legitimate customer behavior. Behavioral analytics are therefore essential for detecting deviations that manual review would miss.

Use of AI and Automation to Conduct Structuring or Transaction Smurfing

Criminals in 2025 increasingly rely on AI tools to automate structuring and smurfing techniques. These tools can programmatically break transactions into thousands of smaller amounts, schedule transfers to avoid regulator attention, and even create synthetic digital identities for account setup. Because of this automation, banks may see dozens or hundreds of tiny transactions occurring across multiple accounts at speeds and volumes no human could manually coordinate. This represents a new type of red flag that traditional rules-based monitoring may overlook unless supported by machine learning detection.

Transactions Involving Shell Companies or Opaque Ownership Structures

Opaque corporate structures continue to be one of the clearest indicators of possible money laundering. Criminal networks often operate through companies with no legitimate commercial activity, no employees, and minimal public presence. These entities may be registered in jurisdictions known for strong secrecy laws or mass-registration addresses. It is also common to see nominee directors with hundreds of directorships or frequent beneficial ownership changes designed to mask control. Compliance officers must review registries in multiple jurisdictions and verify that the business has real economic substance.

Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML) Red Flags

Trade-based money laundering is difficult to detect because illicit activity is hidden inside legitimate supply chain operations. Compliance officers should monitor mismatches between invoice values and shipping records, discrepancies between declared commodities and observed cargo, and the use of intermediaries with unclear commercial purpose. AI-generated invoices, falsified customs documents, and automated shipping manipulation are increasingly common. Businesses should use document-scanning technology and cross-checking tools to validate authenticity and consistency.

Cryptoasset and Digital Wallet Activity That Obscures Fund Origin

Crypto laundering is now mainstream and remains a major area of regulatory focus. Suspicious patterns include using mixing services, moving funds rapidly across multiple blockchains, transacting with wallets previously flagged by blockchain analytics, and sending assets through exchanges with weak KYC protocols. Privacy coins that obscure sender and receiver details also present risk. Monitoring tools that analyze transaction flows on public blockchains are now considered essential for identifying high-risk activity.

Cross-Border Transactions Involving High-Risk Jurisdictions

The geographic component of transactions remains a foundational red flag. Payments routed through countries with weak AML frameworks, high corruption indexes, or known sanctions evasion corridors require extra scrutiny. Compliance officers should investigate payment chains that involve unexpected jurisdictions or multiple hops through unfamiliar correspondent banks. These routing patterns often indicate layering or the use of intermediary jurisdictions to hide the true origin of funds.

Unrealistic or Non-Transparent Business Activity

Businesses that do not match their financial footprint present a substantial red flag. For example, a company with no discernible online presence may begin moving millions of dollars internationally, or a firm may deposit high volumes despite having no clear operational revenue. Vague descriptions of services, minimal documentation, and inconsistent statements are often early signs that a business might be acting as a front for laundering or other illicit activity.

High-Risk Customer Behavior and Lack of Cooperation

Customers who avoid providing documentation, resist due diligence questions, or refuse to disclose beneficial ownership details should be treated as high risk. Similar concerns apply to customers who insist on secrecy, communicate only through intermediaries, or provide contradictory information during onboarding. These behavioral red flags are often the first sign that the customer may be attempting to conceal illicit activity.

Rapid Movement of Funds With No Economic Purpose

Layering often involves fast movement of funds between accounts with no logical commercial explanation. A red flag appears when money is deposited and immediately transferred out, when funds move in circular patterns between the same set of accounts, or when short-lived balances repeatedly appear and disappear. Machine learning-driven transaction monitoring is particularly effective at identifying these anomalies because it can detect subtle inconsistencies across time.

Suspicious Use of Professional Intermediaries

Lawyers, accountants, trust companies, and corporate service providers can be misused to create distance between criminals and their funds. Compliance teams should be vigilant when intermediaries form unusually large numbers of shell companies, act without clear commercial justification, or submit documents that appear inconsistent. Regulators emphasize the importance of enhanced due diligence for these service providers because they are frequently exploited in large-scale laundering networks.

The Role of AI and Technology in Modern Money Laundering

Artificial intelligence is transforming the laundering landscape by accelerating the ability of criminals to generate false identities, manipulate transaction patterns, and automate complex networks of accounts. AI tools can create realistic synthetic identity documents, generate deepfake audio and video for verification processes, and even simulate natural customer behavior to bypass KYC controls. Meanwhile, criminals use algorithmic models to optimize transaction timing, distribution, and routing.

Businesses must counter this with advanced technologies such as machine learning algorithms for anomaly detection, NLP-based document verification, graph analytics for mapping relationships between entities, and real-time data monitoring. Regulators in the United States, EU, and Asia highlight technological adoption as essential for maintaining AML program effectiveness, acknowledging that manual review alone cannot detect AI-enabled laundering.

How Businesses Can Stay Protected in 2025

Use Automated and AI-Enhanced Screening Tools

Automated screening systems allow organizations to process large volumes of customer and transactional data accurately and quickly. They ensure immediate updates from sanctions, watchlists, PEP databases, and adverse media feeds. Machine learning systems reduce false positives while identifying hidden relationships and behavioral anomalies that traditional rule-based systems cannot detect.

Perform Risk-Based Due Diligence

A risk-based approach helps organizations allocate resources where they are needed most. This includes verifying beneficial ownership using multiple sources, reviewing customer activity trends, validating business models and revenue streams, and assessing geographic exposure. High-risk customers should undergo enhanced due diligence, which may involve deeper documentation checks, third-party verification, or onsite visits.

Strengthen Transaction Monitoring

Effective monitoring systems evaluate a combination of contextual and behavioral indicators. These include expected customer activity, device and IP intelligence, payment routing trends, cross-border flows, and supply chain documentation. Monitoring frameworks must be adaptive so they can adjust to new typologies and identify emerging patterns that signal layering or integration.

Train Staff Regularly

Human oversight remains essential despite the shift toward automated controls. Staff must be trained on evolving risks, including AI-driven fraud, cryptoasset tracing, advanced sanctions evasion techniques, and industry-specific typologies. Regular training ensures staff can interpret alerts properly and escalate suspicious activity when algorithms alone cannot provide full context.

Maintain Strong Governance and Documentation Practices

Regulators require complete and verifiable documentation of compliance decisions, customer due diligence, and transaction investigations. Maintaining accurate audit trails allows organizations to demonstrate compliance during examinations or inquiries and protect themselves from penalties. Strong governance frameworks ensure accountability, quality control, and alignment with evolving global standards.

Conclusion

Money laundering in 2025 is shaped by rapid advancements in technology and increasingly complex global financial networks. Compliance officers must identify evolving red flags, understand how criminals use AI and automation, and implement strong risk-based controls. Organizations that invest in automated screening, enhanced monitoring, staff training, and robust governance are better positioned to detect illicit activity and protect themselves from regulatory, financial, and reputational risks.

sanctions.io is a highly reliable and cost-effective solution for real-time screening. AI-powered and with an enterprise-grade API with 99.99% uptime are reasons why customers globally trust us with their compliance efforts and sanctions screening needs.

To learn more about how our sanctions, PEP, and criminal watchlist screening service can support your organisation's compliance program: Book a free Discovery Call.

We also encourage you to take advantage of our free 7-day trial to get started with your sanctions and AML screening (no credit card is required).

New Sanctions Screening Guide
Download our free Sanctions Screening Guide
Download our FREE Sanctions Screening Guide and learn how to set up an effective sanctions screening process in your organization.
Download our FREE Sanctions Screening Guide and learn how to set up an effective sanctions screening process in your organization.
New Case Study
Discover how technology companies streamline global sanctions compliance with sanctions.io
Editorial Team
This article was put together by the sanctions.io expert editorial team.
Basit Nayani
With experience in digital marketing, business development, and content strategy across mainland Europe, the UK and Asia, Basit Nayani joined the team as Head of Marketing & Growth in 2025.
Enjoyed this read?

Subscribe to our Newsletter right now and never miss again any new Articles, Guides and more useful content for your AML and Sanctions compilance.

Success! Your email has been successfully registered for our newsletter.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.